After intense protests against the delay of the historic house proclamation, Deuba has turned defensive saying that he could never support monarchy after all the "bads" he has had faced with the monarchy in the past. It is natural for Deuba to try to act defensive for he was responsible for the delay in the approval of the house proclamation. Deuba might have other issues, however, it came at a wrong time. People are constantly monitoring and waiting for results which can match their interests and those which can account for the death of so many people. Deuba seems to have felt the punchline. Deuba is reportedly angry at reports saying that they were basically aimed to end his character and ruin his political career.
Read more: http://dreamnepal.wordpress.com

Is this guy insane or has be become the victim of some other politician's game? I personally would think that he will not generally support monarchy in power, however, you never know these politicians...may be Deuba is expecting another coup...and yet another time to be a nominated PM...

That's a lie. According to one other blog report, it's late to go defensive for him because he already gave an interview to bbc supporting gyane's ass.

What's wrong with deuba's nautankis. He needs to be fired. He has too much strings attached to the king.

If u had listen to BBC he is not supporting king!!!!!He is democrat and knows more about democracy than MAOIST(wishes).He wants clear path and process not KING.WHY Don't nepalese people listen and ready to burn tires and damage national property .Thats the kind of democracy we want in NEPAL.

Deuba Chor, Desh Chod....

I listened to what deuba said n' Lila Pokhrel said in BBC interview.

IMI, do you expect deuba to say directly that he wants king to be 'Paramadhipati'? He has still got some cunningness to imply it. However, he can't fool people. He is supporter of gyane that I can tell by listening his interview to BBC.

Gwajo,
why do u think he would be supporter of king after the king has done so much to him.I don't think if he has little bit of self respect he wouldn't.. I think he is scared that probelm might arise later in countries soverignity and independence.think about it with no clear process.Some non democratic forces can take advantage.

I hope that he has some respect for himself; but unfortunately he doesn't seem to have the one. Expecting him to speak straightly in favor of gyane is not gonna happen. But his interview implies that he's trying to save gyane's ass.

He doesn't have any respect coz' culprits like wagle are still in his party. Long time back, Kantipur published a story when he was PM; there's not even a bridge to go his birthplace, and he doesn't give damn about it. I don't know how these people still get elected.

Show me one party who doesn't have corrupt MPs. corrupt means border term not only with money.Either they are driven by china,india and us or some other forces not with their vision and dedication for the country.I still give deuba benefit of doubt.

Every party has got corrupted bastards. However, the accused criminals like wagle, khume, gacchedar, gupta, govinda raj joshi being in a higher post is unbearable.

Deuba has created chaos and problems whenever he was in the parliament; so he should never be given a chance to be PM again; their party can elect other cadre for that post. He can never be fair with the presence of arju rana et al.

In due process i hope they do.And they need to put that bastards behind bar.Don't judge a person affliation by their cast.There are ranas and shahs in democatic alliances as well

I'm not judging b'coz she's just rana. If you know some of deeds n' attitudes of her, you'll know what i'm talking about. Now, she's even trying to come to lime light. I just dislike aristocrat mentality. She even mentioned abt it while her recent visit to NY n' i read the whole discussion abt it on sajha.

regardlessly,
Deuba is a scumbag and a incompetent leader and a big screwup. he has strings attached to royals through his wife and that is a fact.

this faggot deuba is itiching his dirty ass for quite some time now. he needs to be fu__cked up in his ass really bad. somebody please give me the lubricant. i will do the honor....


oohi deshbhakta

loote

Kukkur bro,

In the other thread you were talking about American men, now here you are talking about having anal sex with Shere Deuba. Are you using Sajha platform to come out of the closet? Not that anything's wrong with it, as in Seinfeld.

Deuba's every action proved him a pro-monarchist. He splitted his own party (built by thousands of hands) just to empower RNA and it's supreme-commander-in-chief Gyane. Indeed, he was the one who increased the budget of palace 7 times. Honestly speaking, he never wanted a peaceful resolution of the current conflicts, but supported RNA in its move to crack down them by gun.

Both Deuba and the palace were great actors. It sounds like what Gyane did was just a plan by both Deuba and the palace. Palace acted like sacking Deuba, and Deuba acted like being sacked by the palace. Both had hands in destroying the "budding " democracy in the past.

Some discussion on this matter in ND group.

Private names and email addresses are deleted.

Nepe

******************************
From: ...
To:
Cc: "Minendra Rijal" <...>; "Madhav K Nepal" <...>; "Prakash Gyawali" <...>; "np insec Kundan Aryal" <...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ND]Perhaps Mrinendra Rijalji can explain what's going on


> ....ji,
>
> One, the parliament's declaration was technically for the interim period,
> that is, for until a new constitution is brought about by the Constitutional
> Assembly.
>
> Two, since Sher Bahadur Deuba has not said that King should be removed from
> the head of the sate for this interim period, it should be assumed that
> Deubaji was viewing the king as the head of the sate for this period.
>
> Three, Deubaji, in his BBC interview, was not only admitting, but also
> defending, giving examples of other countries, that the head of the state
> (as I explained above, Deubaji was meaning the king) should be/remain the
> supreme commander-in-chief of the army.
>
> Now, unless Deubaji has proposed to remove the King from the head of the
> state for this interim period, it is clear that Deubaji wants the king to
> retain the title of the supreme commander-in-chief.
>
> So, I would like to request Mrinendra Rijal-jee to explain why his party is
> doing this terrible thing against the spirit of Jana-andolan and the wish of
> a vast majority of Nepali people ?
>
> ....
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ...
> To:
> Cc: "Minendra Rijal" <...>; "Madhav K Nepal"
> <...>; "Prakash Gyawali" <...>; "np
> insec Kundan Aryal" <...>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:22 AM
> Subject: [ND] Re: Massive public pressure will bring citizen's declaration
> to come true.
>
>
>>
>> Dear all,
>> In trying to give oneself a more rebellious look, we are going to far
>> and trying to blame Girija babu or Sher Bahadur for everything. When
>> he made a statement denying what was floated in the media, I think it
>> was enough. It looks that we havent still learnt from our past
>> mistakes. KG will try to play all the tricks he has under his bag to
>> divide the SPA and with communist blaming congress for everything and
>> vice versa, we r only playing into his hands. Any decision that is
>> ratified by the cabinet will have a more legal footing. So until any
>> amendment is made to change the constitution, it seems logical that,
>> things be decided in cabinet first.
>> Success of the janaandolan 2 lies, not in being more rebellious, but
>> taking a cautious approach and consent of all the parties.
>> Regards
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/16/06, ... <...> wrote:
>>> *Dear ... ji,*
>>> *Your concern is valid. As per my information, from very reliable source,
>>> things are little more. Yesterday when discussion was going on between
>>> supremos only and with cabinet ministers, except DPM Oli, who did not
>>> attend
>>> the meeting, things suddenly became complicated. It is our astonishment
>>> that
>>> previously the working group(WG) of SPA(Seven party alliance) used to
>>> work
>>> out and prepare the documents. Documents prepared by the WG were
>>> hardly rejected. But this time First: Supremos decided to hold meeting
>>> barring working group members. They all were told to sit in another room.
>>> Second: G.P. Koirala and S.B. Deuba both brought their separate document
>>> on
>>> public declaration. I did not know about M.K. Nepal. Third: Koirala
>>> advised
>>> to pass the declaration from the cabinet first, then to produce to the
>>> Parliament. This was accepted. Fourth: Due to this, precondition of
>>> complete
>>> cabinet structure aroused. And, yesterday's plan to make citizen's
>>> declaration have been now suspended.*
>>> *I have some question due to my inability to understand completely I
>>> presume. People's movement is more powerful than parliament and
>>> parliament
>>> is more powerful than cabinet and cabinet is never complete, it could be
>>> expanded or reduced. But for me Prime Minister is the cabinet, complete
>>> cabinet. So, I do not know why our leaders choose this opposite
>>> methodology.
>>> Till now, we all know that important pledge, commitments and declarations
>>> were made in the parliament and no body suggested to come through cabinet
>>> decision.*
>>> *Let us hope that due to massive public pressure the leaders will be able
>>> to
>>> make the declaration ASAP. The draft copy of declaration is much better
>>> than
>>> published in HIMAL of today. Secular state and equality and equity based
>>> society is the promise. But who knows which one is true? Or come as
>>> true.*
>>> *Thanks,*

____

View/Share this post only

In principle what Deuba said is not incorrect. The state heads are the supreme commander of the army also, if we see the traditions and practises of other countries but irony is that our state head does not respect the universal traditions and practises.

It will be just an stupidity to expect King G to be as ceremonial as Queen Elizabeth of UK or King Akihito of Japana or other European monarchs.

Its not Deuba but the king himself must appear in TV and claim the supremacy of the army and convince the nation that he would remain inactive.

And Deuba, he has to always do something funny or create a scandal to show his presence in Nepali politics.

In Nepali proverb said.....

"Chor ko TuLo Shor...."

Deuba eat Rs 50 Karod and Melamchi Drinking Water Project.

He is not only common type criminal and corrupted crooks..... He destroyed peace, development, and help to create Maoist revolution.

Dueba destroyed Nepal and Nepali reputation in international arena like World Bank, Asian Development Bank. Nobody trusts to Nepal and Nepali.

Now who will help Nepal to build and who will give Loan to developed Nepal.

Nobody.....

So Deuba and his criminals and corrupted followers must be hanged in front of Public Park.

Guys,
Agreed, Deuba was not the best leader we have had but it might also be the case that things have been over-diverted. Yesterday, he claimed that he would be the most happiest if the outcome is the removal of the king.
After we remove the king, I agree with Deuba that the head(president?) should be the supreme chief of army...