Friends lets discuss about whether to have ceremonial king or republic . Post your opinions I am for republic.

CEREMONIAL KING IS OBSOLETEE.. he takes all our money and govenremtn revenue. definetely republic.

because of culture and traditions, nepal cannot survive as a republic. definately ceremonial king.

Sujan Bro, Are you ready to accept Paras as king?

Does this question hold validity anymore? We are already heading for republic...
Question, dismissed.

how about this question. would you accept paras as a king or a state of India...

At the moment Girija Gonna be Prime Minister , once again, whether you like it or not.

that' going to piss sher bahadur deuba...

It will be a joint cabinet and Kamal Thapa will be Griha Mantri again. What is the difference ? So funny

People,
be optimistic.....i think the current movement is not going on becasue the Parties asked for it, nor it is because maoist forced it. People are coming out to the streets because we are sick and tired of this autocracy, uncertainity and u know the rest.

i thik Girija will be the next PM.

And Girija will start to screw up gagan thapas political career again.

REPUBLIC NO DOUBT.
GIVE ME DEATH OR FREEDOM

AP98, of course Girija is try to screw Gagan Thapa's career. Its the basic law of nature. Survival of the Fittest. But now its gonna get interesting, Girija knows NC is gonna go down, coz its already smaller because of Deuba fraction, now maoist is gonna share a big portion of the votes, etc. etc. Now is he stubborn to hold on the the seat and take NC down with him or is he gonna let a new face come? the Maoist do have strong contenders in politics, so if Girija sticks to NC, NC is history.

Gagan should know that he is into politics, its ABC of Politics that he should know how to survive. He should be strong enough to survive, orelse if he is moody or dumass then he is gonna be a martyr. I wish him best, I like him but he should know when to do what.

if there are only two choices being under the king or being an indian state. iwould rather choose india at least i would have the freedom of speech

Republic.

next, India can never take over Nepal. Those Nepalese serving in Indian army will not definitely like this idea, and India has to largely depend on them to fight against her since-birth rival.

There is no question to ask ceremonial king or repuiblican.The country is already headed towards republican.I think it's wise to discuss a new thread like,how we reform as republican country .How about Himalayan Republic of Nepal.

Ganatantra Jindabad!

No matter what, Republican. We have to live on our own. Not on King or India.

HMM,
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL
AUTOCRATIC KINGDOM OF GAYNE
HIMALI PRADESH OF INDIA

OBVIOUSLY DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL SOUNDS GOOD TO ITS CORE

Anyone for People's Rebublic of Nepal with Maoist only?