There is one individual in Sajha, obviously retarded (Susta Manasthiti), who has such a narrow and pathetic mind that he readily brand others, who may have slightly or greatly differing political view, as Royalist. By his definition, roughly 6000 voters who decided to vote in eKantipur to voice their support for the upcoming election are Royalists.

The retard just fails to comprehend the fact that there are many people who support the King at the moment but would want a full-fledged democracy in Nepal at some point in the future but not just yet. Still the retard keeps on parroting the same chant day and night. So much so, the retard goes on to accomplishing a mentally challenging task (for him!) of creating a thread in Sajha saying that Royalists are disgusting. That at a time when he does not know what a royalist is!
see - http://sajha.com/sajha/html/openThread.cfm?forum=2&ThreadID=26992

But one can not blame him for his immature behaviour because after all, he is retarded. Instead we should encourage him to learn more as he has learnt to use the computer even being as retarded as he is.

good nite everyone

You are far more pscho than him--- Have a check with a good head doctor.

-Well wisher!

I agree to N Shrestha that some fools just brand anyone as royalist if their views differ.

But Mr. Shrestha , you should not also stoop to their level. If someone is immature and keeps on chirping like a parrot, just ignore him/her. He/she is simply stupid and you should not spend your energy writing a thread about him.

PEOPLE ARE MEANT TO BE STUPID

As a rational being we always have choices. For instance, say you and i. i like apples but not orange and you like orange and not apples. Now, when i already know that i like apples because i have researched about it, eaten it and i like, for you to pursuade me to start liking oranges, i think you want to tell me good things about oranges before telling me bad things about apples. I am saying this metaphorically. If people like the king, let them like him, or if they like the parties let them like them. but if you like the king, then you should tell all good things about king. if you like the parties,then you tell good things about the party. I think that is a more mature approach to pursuade someone to agree with you, unless you don't want anyone to agree with you or don't want to agree with anyone.

if you buy a toyota, you must like it completely, unless you've always desired a mercedes but couldn't afford and settled for a toyota. but you could have also got a honda for the same price, then why toyota, or even honda. you must have your own reasons to believe what you like, but don't have reasons to not accept what others are saying. you can comment and opionate, but do not attack anyone personally. but saying good things about someone you like is not being chamcha or royalist.gandhi is loved by all but equal number of people think he was the reason of india-pakistan conflict. so, is gandhi good or bad. it's up to you. you think he is good, you are not gandhi's chamcha, you like his work. you don't like him, you are not a radical, you just don't like his work.

अन्धो भक्तहरुले सदैव अरुलाई गलत नै ठान्दछन् ।
तलुवा चाट्नेहरु, सदैव तलुवा चाट्नमा तल्लिन रहन्छन् ।

यो त नेपालिको परम्परा बसिसकेको छ ।
सबै कुरा भारतिय देखासिखी मै अल्झेको छ ।

Sajha User, you said it right!!

Anyway, in defence of Mr. Shrestha, sometimes you have to fight fire with fire!!

Need realplayer to watch the following lecture.

http://real.video.ufl.edu:8080/ramgen/agr2612/regulation_int.rm

sujanks i appreciate your efforts, but it is not making much sense. you like apples you don't llike oranges means you have tried both apples and oranges. so no persuation is needed you already know what is that you like.

anyways we are not agruing about apples or oranges here we are debating for the right to choose apple or orange by a democratic process.

if people like gyane so much do you think he will win elections if he were to contend? hell no he will loose by landslide.
gandhi did the right thing or not i don't know since we can't undo what is done and see what it would be like if it weren't. we have seen gyane and his deeds and we know (at least i do) that as long as there is monarchy nepal can never progress. having said that i do not think nepal will be like switzerland or anything of that sort but it could be much better that today
i know you are not a fan of gyane this comment is just aimed at your comment

" we have seen gyane and his deeds and we know (at least i do) that as long as there is monarchy nepal can never progress."
SPEAK FOR YOURSELF,need to put in I instead of we(don't voice my opinion).

when i say "WE" i am refering to people of similar view points as mine. do you think i would even bother to "voice" your opinion? MORON, SIMPLETON, NINCOMPOOP
they are all your favourite words. hehehe

Yeah Your pea size brain does not have the capacity to foresee that WE means you and your like minded cronies ONLY. Cause there are a lotta MORONS like you who go on the records saying this is what Nepal wants not thinking there are a lotta people who don't think likewise.
I see you are trying to learn new words ...he he !! Keep it up son ! Ha ha !

so what is your stance bitch?

Birbhadra jee, Then could you please give me a name whom you'd agree to control the economics and politics of nepal. someone... i can certainly give you one. My approach is to let HMKG do what he wanted for 3 years and we all agreed on that. Had we not, we would have protested way back then. Now it is too late, too early to call his actions insatiable to what he is doing for the people of nepal. 7-parties must understand that by disrupting daily human activities with protest only slows down the process of democracry. maoist must understand that they cannot win by force and assault. HMKG must understand that freedom of speech is a right defined clearly in the constitution. so, my friend if you could give me one good reason why the king should let the governance be given to anyone else is valid or agreeable. pls enlighten me with your insights, whom should we support. as of now, i see three bodies in nepal - the king, the 7-party alliance, the maoists, unless you have your own.

What are you going to gain by getting that info Mr Simpleton ? he he
Shit fur brains thinks he is conducting a poll here. ha ha ha
Or maybe he thinks he is the election comission for Nepal ? ahhh ha ha ha
I am not gaining or losing anything here by giving you that info. nor is it going to make the situation there any better. Therefore your argument has no relevance.
God gave you a head MORON USE IT SOMETIMES, instead of barking like a HAKUCHA ! he he