There are several cases that Indian police force and Indian army invade Nepal border villages and also they move boundry pillars toward Nepal.

That means India illegally expanding thier boundry and we are easily loosing our land and boundry day by day.

Nepal government and Nepali political parites do not care about it.

Report: " Nepal-India Open Border: Prospects, Problems and Challenges"

http://www.fes.de/aktuell/focus/focus_1/documents/19.pdf


http://www.greaternepal.com/gallery.htm

" Nepal Border and Regional Security Issues "

By Kamala Sarup

Nepal, India border officials met yesterday and discussed increasing terrorist activities. According to the report, a joint operation will be conducted to combat terrorist activities. Border officials agreed terrorist activities can be eliminated with cooperation.

Beyond the more than 12,000 dead souls the insurgency has claimed, lies the torrid pace of small arms transactions said to be occurring between the Maoist rebels in Nepal, Northern India, merchants disposing of arms which have been upgraded from the Royal Nepali military and police forces, and armed brigands who claim, falsely, to be Maoist rebels.

Beyond the Maoist insurgency's direct costs. the small arms trafficking takes a large toll on the general population of Nepal. Crime is said to be increasing with fewer and fewer youths respecting the old ways and some even turning to murder-for-hire schemes in an effort to get rich quick. Such violence has, of course, a negative impact on the growth of tourism, which is a leading source of revenue for Nepal. Nepal's security position has been adversely affected by its status as one of the world's Lesser Developed Countries. But the ongoing political and military dimensions of the problem have exacerbated the situation.

Nepal's definition of security depends heavily upon its relationship with India, which nearly surrounds Nepalese territory. Nepal has a virtually open and unregulated border with Sikkim, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal.

The India-Nepal approach to solving mutual political and military conflicts are most important to creating a secure border area between the two countries. Concerned over increasing crime-related incidents along the border, Nepal and India have agreed to mobilize special security personnel in the sensitive areas to control criminal activities. This was decided during talks between security officials from the two countries who met recently in Janakpur.

Moreover, India and Nepal are bound by treaty to assist one another in mutual security matters. The 1950 treaty and letters stated that "neither government shall tolerate any threat to the security of the other by a foreign aggressor" and obligates both sides "to inform each other of any serious friction or misunderstanding with any neighboring state likely to cause any breach in the friendly relations subsisting between the two governments".

The scaling down of tensions in the Pashupatinagar area in far eastern Nepal between Nepalese and Indians is a welcome step to help heal divisions between the two countries. The tension arose there because some misguided Indian officials unilaterally set up a border marker in an area that was in disputed territory.

Other ongoing irritants to a smoother border security relationship between Nepal and India include a 1950 treaty which some in Nepal claim confers unequal benefits upon India.

Under this treaty, a series of dams were constructed along the international border which submerged thousands of Nepali villages. Other petty annoyances include obstructions posed by some Indian officials with regard to the export of Nepali products to India, an ongoing problem of Bhutanese refugees, and what some in Nepal perceive as a "haughty" and paternalistic attitude by some insensitive Indian government officials towards Nepal and her problems. On the Nepali side, some transport interests in Nepal feel threatened by an unlimited opening by Nepal to cargo vehicles coming in from India.

There are thousands of Nepali and Indians constantly visiting each other's countries, and any comprehensive border security agreement should take this into account. There should be a balancing of interests between the free flow of goods and people which benefit the economies of both countries with the opportunity such cross-border travel affords to would-be terrorists and illicit goods trafficking. To solve this problem, perhaps a strengthened permanent commission composed of authorities from both countries should be considered.

Nepal has been fighting the violence from the Maoists for more than 10 years now, and possibly India has information about problems faced by Nepal which can be greatly useful in mutually solving this vexing problem. We Nepalis and Indians should determine that no Nepalese or Indian soil will be allowed to be used for any activity detrimental to either country.

In addition to India, Nepal shares a border with China. Nepal has also signed agreements with China such as the Treaty of Peace and Friendship in 1960, road construction project from Kathmandu to Kodari (1961) and resolving the boundary issue between the two countries (1961) which influence border security. Moreover, there ahs recently ben reopened the road between China and Nepal. The road has strategic and political importance to any comprehensive regional security efforts. Finally, China has recently begun the construction of an electric rail transport system between the two countries.

It is my personal hope that any dialogue in good faith between the Maoists and the government will result in progress towards a lasting and just peace. These developments could ease tensions and reduce violence in the Nepal Indian border region.

The first steps have already been taken on the road to peace. Nepal is a small but proud country which can contribute even more to solving remaining Nepal-India border problems and help the world cut down the scourge of international terrorist activity.

Kamala Sarup is an editor of peacejournalism.com

Why do India need to do that when whole Nepal is thiesr?????All the Politicians of SPAM are there slaves ..Indian army is doing unnessecary effort.

" The Nepal India Open Border "

Dr. Vidya Bir Singh Kansakar

Before the signing of the Sugauli Treaty between Nepal and India and subsequent demarcation of the Nepal India boundary, there existed free and unrestricted movement of people of Nepal and India across the border. It was almost impossible to control and regulate the movement of people along more than 1400 kilometres long border. Nevertheless, there existed main thoroughfare for social relations, cultural exchanges (pilgrimages, festivities, fairs, etc.) and trade and commerce and they constituted the major road junctions and places for levying customs duties. Nepal-India border is unique in the world in the sense that people of both the countries can cross it from any point despite the existence of border check posts at several locations. The number of check posts meant for carrying out bilateral trade are 22 and however, only six transit points out of them, the movement of nationals of third countries who require entry and exit visa permitted to cross the border. As the whole length of the border except the check posts, is not patrolled by police or paramilitary or military forces of either country, illegal movement of goods and people is a common feature on both sides of the India-Nepal border.

It is not known how the system of free movement of people on either side of the border continued even after the delineation and demarcation of Nepal-India border after 1816. Prior to the 1814 war, movement of people of both countries was allowed, but they were not allowed to purchase land and settle in the Tarai. Nevertheless, Nepal has been the land of shelter for the refugees fleeing due to the fear from powerful enemies. The Lichhavis, the Mallas and the Shakyas who existed before the birth of the Buddha, took refugee in the Tarai and the Valleys of the Himalayas when their lands were occupied by Ajatasatru. Similarly, during the Muslim invasions of India, the Mallas and the Shahs were said to have taken refugee in Nepal. The growing domination of the British East India Company in India prompted the rulers of Nepal to restrict the movement of Indians into Nepal. Moreover, the Tarai could not be brought under cultivation through immigrants from India, because they were neither permitted to purchase land nor entitled to have tenancy rights. Thus the large tracts of the Tarai were covered by dense forests and infested with malaria. The cattle herders of adjoining Indian territories of Champaran and other districts used to graze cattle annually for four months (October to January) by paying duty. Duty was levied on buffaloes and the cows were exemp ted from the levy (Kirkpatrick, 1801:83). Similarly, the agreement on Dudhawa Range specially preserved the right of the Indian nationals to come to the hills for banks (a type of grass) by paying revenue. Prior to 1789, the Nepal Government established bazaars on the border of Nepal and India for regulating trade and decided that trade could be conducted at these points only. This hampered the freedom of trade, as the British (Indian) merchants had to cross the Nepalese in the bazaars, and return with whatever they could not sell. Anyone entering Nepal particularly the Kathmandu Valley and other places in the Tarai in general, prior to the restoration of Oudh Tarai to Nepal in 1860, had to get rahadani or visa from the district governor. This was relaxed during the festival of Shivaratri and after the festival the combing up operation to expel all those who had come to attend the festival. This system continued even after the insttallation of democracy in 1951 until the opening of the Tribhuvan Rajpath in late 1950s.

The Treaty of 1860 and the Nepal India Open Border

In recognition of the supply of Nepalese army at the disposal of the British East India Company to quell the Sepoy Mutiny, the Treaty of 1 November 1860 signed between India and Nepal restored the territory ceded to India by by the 1816 Treaty of Suguali. Prime Minister Jung Bahadur tried to develop the Far Western Tarai restored to Nepal by the British as his family property. In order to develop it he made provision in the first legal code of the country formulated during his time, in which the foreigners were entitled to purchase and sell land in the Tarai. He even invited the businessmen, traders and the landlords from India.. This led to the large scale immigration of the Indian into the Tarai for reclamation of forests for agriculture and for trade and commerce. In the eastern Tarai Yadav community exploited this opportunity and their significant number is the instance in point. There were also some of them settling over these places before that. Moreover, in the historical past after the draining away of the Kathmandu Valley lake, some of the cow herders from the south settled in Nepal and said to have established the Gopalbanshi Dynasty. Before the conquest of the Kathmandu Valley by King Prithvinarayan Shah, the culture and economy of the Valley was so rich that it not only attracted people from outside, but it also assumed the role of melting pot, wherein the in-migrants to the valley coming both from the south and north adopted the Newari culture and language.

The British Government kept the Nepal-India border open primarily for two purposes. The first was to maintain unrestricted migration of the Nepalese hill people to India and to secure them for recruitment in the Indian army. The recruitment of the Nepalese in British army was very difficult up to the period of Prime Minister Ranodip Singh, because Nepal Government was in principle against the recruitment of its people in a foreign army. The clandestine and secret operations adopted by the British to get Nepalese hill people in the Indian army were disliked by the Nepalese government who took strong measures to discourage it. Some of the Gorkhas serving in Indian army on their return home on leave were even put to death and property of those serving the Indian army was confiscated (Mojumdar, 1973:42-3). Sensing the harassment, meted to families of the Gorkhas in the Indian army by the Nepalese government and to make the recruitment easier, the British Government encouraged migration of the Gorkhas from Nepal with their families and established Gorkha settlements in the hills of India, such as Bhagsu, Bakloh, Almora, Darjeeling, Deharadun, Shillong, etc.(H.M.S.O, 1965:61) It was only during the period of Prime Minister Bir Shumsher that the Nepalese government freely allowed enlistment of Nepalese in the Indian army (Kansakar, 1982::77-124).

The second important factor for maintaining open border by the British was to have easy and free access of British and Indian manufactured goods into Nepal as well as to Tibet wherein Nepal was the only easy and accessible route from India before the discovery of Chumbi Valley route from Sikkim.. Moreover, the British wanted to have secure and easy supply of raw materials from Nepal into India such as timber and forest produce, herbs and medicinal plants, hides and skins, etc.

Treaty of Friendship between Great Britain and Nepal 1923 and the Development of the Tarai The large scale involvement of men from the hills of Nepal in the World War I led to the shortage of able-bodied youths particularly the Magars and the Gurungs and resulting drastic decline in agriculture activities and shortage of foddgrains in the hills. More than 200,000 Nepalese took part in the war with a casualty of 20,000 men or one in every 10. In recognition of this assistance the Britihs government gave Nepal an annual gift of Rs. 100,000 in perpetuity and the amount was increased to Rs. 200,000 after the World War II (Mansergh and Moon, 1976:62).Most of those who were retired and released from war duty after the war, instead of coming back to Nepal stayed in India where they could get employment in police and para-military services, security services in factories, offices as well as domestic servants in Indian cities where they were in great demand for their honesty, loyalty and hardwork. In recognition of the contribution of Nepal in the World War I, the Treaty of Friendship between Great Britain and Nepal signed at Kathmandu on 21 December 1923 recognised Nepal as a sovereign independent country. and this treaty erased from the mind the apprehension of invasion by the British. In order to meet the food grains need of the country and to resettle the landless, Prime Minister Chandra Shumsher initiated the development of the Tarai. The clearing of the forests in the Tarai provided agricultural lands on the one hand and on the other hand, the fell down sal tree provided much needed timber for the slippers in the expansion of the Indian railways. Due to the fear of malaria and unbearable heat of the Tarai, the hill people reluctant to move to the Tarai and the programme rather benefited the immigrants from India. Moreover, the development programmes of the Tarai during the period of Chandra Shumsher like railways from Amlrkhganj to Raxaul and Janakpur to Jayanagar, Chandra canal etc attracted more immigrants from India.

The Nepal India Treaty of 1950 and the Open Border

The Nepal India Treaty of 1950 which was signed in July 31 agreed to grant, on a reciprocal basis, to the nationals of one country in the territories of the other the same privileges the matter of residence, ownership of property, participation in trade and commerce, movement and other privileges of a similar nature was the major turning point in the movement of the Indians into Nepal and was further reinforced by the Nepal India open border. However, it was not materialised until the installation of democracy in February 1951, which replaced the oligarchic Rana regime within three and half months of the signing of the treaty. It is said that the evolution of incidents in Kashmir, Nizam State of Hydrabad and the Indian states and territories bordering China, during his assuming of the portfolio of Home Minister, Sardar Patel strongly pleaded and persuaded Prime Minister Nehru to impose some sort of control over Nepal and the result was the Treaty of 1950 and the reflection of it is clearly revealed by his letter to Nehru (See appendix). It is to be noted that the Rana government assisted Indian Government by sending Nepalese troops, when India has to face problems in Hydrabad during independence and in Kashmir in 1948..

(Excerpts: paper on Nepal-India Open Border: Prospects, Problems and Challenges; for full text log on to www.ifa.org.np/talk.php)

Nepal India broder issues:

http://www.nepalnews.com.np/contents/englishweekly/spotlight/2002/nov/nov29/forum.htm

You know we can blame the politician and we can blame the government but we can also blame the people who are living outside of the country also. For example when king siezed the power it was these same Nepalese on the street who did not want king in NY etc... Why can't we do the same when an Indian couselor tries to enter his embasy why not all the Nepalese living aborad stop him and ask him question reguarding what India is doing at the borders to get attention of the international community.
Also why haven't the Nepalese youth be it moist or Nepali youth in general not voicing any concerns about what it happening are we that worthless or unimaginative.

I also agree with "ne23pe"

yes, you are right.

Why do we voice or do Nepalee conference, convention for this Nepal-India broder problems in USA, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Germany.

It helps to Unite and help us to aware of it.

It helps to shake Nepali government heads and political parites as well.

Is not it?

You know we have such useless Nepalese identity organization in USA and other countries that are doing nothing for the country.
Most of these organization say that they are there to retain Nepali cultures (all cultures of Nepal) but half of their children can't even point in the map and tell you where Nepal is. These organizations are useless and we the new generation should do something to do that and help Nepal in its time and not just say what happening and running away from the problem.

Why Nepalese in USA do not put thies issues in ANA convention?

What ANA does for Nepal?

Uh uh why don't you blame SPAMmer terrorists who have sold Nepal to India...the secret treaties that your father girija signed up in Delhi...bastard SPAMmers.

"One land, two sovereigns "

By C. Raja Mohan

BHADRAPUR (Nepal) Dec. 25. "Small problems here often lead to big tensions between India and Nepal," says Bharatendu Mallik, the young and popular Mayor of this town on the banks of the Mechi River that has long defined Nepal's eastern boundary with India.

A few years ago Mr. Mallik was in the thick of a national controversy, when the entire political establishment from Kathmandu descended here to denounce the alleged "Indian aggression" across the Nepali territory.

A real difficulty was, of course, being blown out of proportion. As part of their effort to demarcate the Indo-Nepal boundary, joint survey teams came up with a new set of boundary pillars that defined the changed alignment.

Some of the new pillars showed up in the campus of the municipal school here underlining the change of sovereignty at an important public place.

A few Nepali farmers found that their lands now belonged to India. In some cases, there were two title deeds for the same piece of land, one from the local government here and the other from the government of West Bengal whose writ runs just across the river.

Nepal certainly "lost" some territory here, but "gained" some elsewhere amidst the realignment of the boundary.

That might look all right in the national capitals; but it poses huge problems for many on the ground whose life and land get caught in the vortex of shifting sovereignties.

New Delhi and Kathmandu have agreed that until they sign off on the new boundary alignment, past arrangements should not be disturbed.

That is easier said than done. Mr. Mallik's interest lies in preserving the interests of his constituents — who would want to hold on to their lands.

***


Many sections of the Indo-Nepal border are along rivers. The earlier understanding was that the boundary ran along the mid channel of the river. But as rivers change course, there is continual shifting of sovereignties.

The decision by the two sides to move towards fixed boundary principle, once and for all, was motivated by the determination to avoid future problems on the riverine boundaries.

But as the two nations apply the fixed boundary principle on the ground, there will be many who will be affected adversely, at least this one time. The challenge for the two Governments lies in offering quick, fair and dignified compensation to all those who must adjust to the changed sovereignty along the border.

***


Mr. Mallik takes us on a drive from his office to the river along a decent road built with Indian assistance and some local contribution.

We walk across the riverbed to a bamboo bridge built on local initiative. "We want a regular bridge," Mr. Mallik keeps reminding the visitors.

But as India steps up its visible assistance to infrastructure development on the Nepali side, questions come fast and furious from the Indians who want to know why New Delhi does not spend the money to improve conditions on its own soil.

Across the Mechi river, we get onto a gravel road that divides West Bengal on the left and Bihar on the right.

The border with Bangladesh is less than 20 km away. Yes, we have entered the famed Siliguri Corridor — a narrow strip of Indian territory that borders Bhutan, Nepal and Bangladesh.

For Mr. Mallik good roads and bridges on both sides, increased flow of commerce and unhindered movement of ordinary people are the answers to the long-term development of the region.

***


Mr. Mallik has a long list of woes on how India and Nepal manage their separate sovereignties on the ground. On the banks of Mechi, there is a thatched hut that passes for a border check post.

People crossing the border at this point are counted and names taken down. Mr. Mallik believes this new vigilance on the border is indeed necessary. But what he does object to is the increased harassment of people along the new check posts.

In the name of security, people are asked to step out of the rickshaws and carry their luggage for nearly a kilometre. Questioning and checking are expected. But why make them walk? The Indian security unit tells us that is the way things have been; but do not know why.

A common complaint on the border is about the corruption and harassment of people who have to drive across the border. Barriers, real and unauthorised, are everywhere collecting a "toll" in the open frontier between the two countries. If these large numbers of frequent visitors were counted as tourists contributing to each other's economy, the two Governments would be moving to simplify and assist the procedures for travel across the border. Today they have created a haven for robbers shaking the visitors for small change.

***

There is a new problem in Nepal — the flooding of fake degrees and certificates from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Whole generations of Nepali middle class have studied in the schools and colleges of these two north Indian States. The racket in fake degrees has become an excuse for unreasonable officials in Nepal to harass even those who had obtained degrees from the Hindi heartland in the past when education there had a lot of credibility.

News: The Hindu

News: about "Susta Nepal broder with India"

courtesy: Informal service sector " Indian agression on Nepal "

Meanwhile, a considerable incident of Indian intervention took place in Susta in May 1964. A joint gang of Indian policemen and burglars attacked Susta. Pitambar Jung Rana and four homeguards were caused to disappear in the attack. Susta lies in Nabalparasi district of Lumbini zone. Indian nationals had been carrying out activities of burglary and attack for a long time in Susta situated on the border region. On January 22, 1965, a gang of Indian burglars entered into Susta all of a sudden and brutally killed two Nepalese citizens, Chandra Bikram Shaha and Jaya Bahadur Nayak, and imprisoned Rabijung in the Gorakhpur jail after he was kidnapped. Likewise, in 1968, Indian officials entered into Susta in an unauthorized manner and kidnapped four Nepalese citizens including a member of the ex-army organization. The kidnapped citizens were imprisoned in the Betiya jail of India. (The Dainik Nirnaya, Bhairahawa, October 14, 1968). Then "again on June 12, 1970, a clash took place between Nepalese citizens and Indian policemen. Recently, a Nepali citizen has been killed. A news has published that two thousand Indian soldiers have been camping in Susta after they entered into the Nepalese territory there on June 12, 1970". (The Charcha weekly, 13 January 1971).

"Once the date and time were set to hold talks after the Susta dispute became very serious, and accordingly, Nepalese officials went to Susta and waited there for 15 days, but the Indian officials did not show up. The second time, although the diologue started, yet it was aborted on the pretext of mid term polls. The third time, although the dialogue was held on April 27, 1963, yet the Indian side dismissed it without signing the minutes". (Hiranya Lal Shrestha: Indo-Nepal Relations, page 57). The Leftist political forces and the students had organized protest demonstrations across the country against Indian aggression and intervention upon Susta, a problem arisen due to the open border. In connection with these demonstrations, scores of citizens and students were arrested in different parts of the country.

Prior to it, the question of Susta had come up in the Indian lower house. On June 19, 1962, Indian prime minister Jawahar Lal Neharu in reply to a question said, "The fact that the dispute has been continuing for generations demonstrates that the problem is a little bit sensitive. A survey should be carried out along with other necessary things, and I think that something has been done to carry out an appropriate survey". The following thing has been mentioned in an information given to the upper house of the Indian parliament on June 26, "Since 1884-85, there has been a dispute between the two countries over the area of 15 miles from Gandaki to Tribeni where the three places - Gorakhpur (Utter Pradesh), Champaran (Bihar) and Nepal are connected together. This has happened because of the change in the direction of the river over the place where the border has been determined. A joint border commission was formed in 1929. Meetings of the representatives of the governments of Nepal and Bihar were held in 1937, 1947, 1952 and 1953 to settle the dispute". (Bhasin A.S: Document on India-Nepal Relations, page 82-83).

Communiques had been repeatedly released by the Indian embassy based in Nepal soon after the later incident of aggression over Susta. However, these communiqu?s were contradictory in themselves and vague. Regarding these communiqu?s, Hiranya Lal Shrestha writes, "... the third communiqu? contains some bitter words, but it has accepted the fact that Nepalese citizens had been arrested by Indian police personnel and has claimed that the area where they had been arrested was Indian territory. The fourth communiqu?, referring to newspapers, has mentioned that according to the legal provision of India, the Indian authorities of the Betiya jail have been writing to the concerned Nepalese authorities to pay the bail on behalf of the jailed ones. In the next communiqu?, it is claimed that since the Nepalese citizens had been arrested together with 4 Indian citizens and had also been suited in the court, the area where they had been arrested belongs to India. (Indo-Nepal Relations, page 58).

The branch river of the river Gandaki called Rahuwa Ghola is regarded as the international border line between Nepal and India in the Susta region. But in course of time, when the course of the River Gandaki changed the river bed under the branch river called Rahuwa Ghola turned into the sandy plain, the Indian side began to claim the ownership of this sandy plain. If the Rahuwa Ghola is regarded as the border line, the whole area covered by the administrative centre of Gandak dam and the Gandak dam itself constructed according to the agreement falls inside the Nepalese territory. But it is obvious that India is not ready to accept this historical fact because of her vested interest and so she is not ready to settle the dispute before it is too late. That is why, one need not hesitate to say that being motivated by this vested interest India does not allow the scheduled talks to be held and continue the talks until a favourable situation is created to fulfil her interest.

During that time, indicating the position of India, The Navabharat Times, an Indian newspaper, wrote, "India has rejected the proposal of Nepal that the border between Nepal and Bihar over a few acres of land in the Susta region be determined on the basis of the map drawn by an English officer in 1817 A.D.. The Indian side has made it clear that the above mentioned map does not have any importance because it is neither accepted by the two governments nor it was drawn on the basis of any survey. India has made it clear that both governments have signed the document of border agreement and its map of 1902, so this only is the valid agreement and, therefore, new border posts can be planted based on it (September 3, 1969). In the same issue, the Nawabharat Times wrote, "India has proposed that the island called Narshahi, which is situated on the border near Susta, can be given to Nepal on lease for 99 years but its sovereignty will be with India. Instead of it, let Nepal give India the area called Susta on lease".

,

see i told you in my earlier threads. nobody CARES!
i say just let india or china control nepal. end of story.
no more bahun, no more newar kich kich.
full stop.

We should build Rail line and join with china and Tibet to develope country in fast past.

Do you think so?

China build world's highest altitude Rail line - China to Tibet:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4778521.stm


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/5133220.stm


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4345494.stm

there you go nationalist. i give you my full support and finance if you can unite China, Tibet and Nepal.

" India to establish Indian Army SSB camp "

- It is illegal by international law and threatening to Nepal

News report by KAMAL PANTHI

SALARPUR (INDIA), Aug 11 - Seema Suraksha Bal (SSB) of India is going to establish a big security camp close to the no-man's-land along the Nepal-India border at Surajpur near Gulariya municipality, the district headquarters of Bardiya.

The Indian authority mulled establishment of the camp to improve security along the border thinking that the Pakistani intelligence agency ISI was using Nepali territory for its activities, claimed SSB officials. Earlier, the SSB camp was situated at Murtiha, four kilometers away from the no-man's-land.

The camp will have various sophisticated weaponry including armored vehicles and long-range searchlights for night time patrolling, said SSB officer AK Singh. Meanwhile, the Nepal-India Joint Survey Team has found that Nepali land has been encroached and is being tilled by Indians. The team discovered some three bighas of land in between pillar number 680/63 and 681/65 encroached by Indians, said a member of the team preferring anonymity.

Meanwhile, a team comprising the chief district officer (CDO), SSP of Nepal Police and a Major of Nepali Army ,Thursday visited the disputed border area. "Preliminary study has shown that Indians have encroached Nepali territory," said CDO Shiva Prasad Nepal, adding, "However, details are yet to come."

http://www.kantipuronline.com/kolnews.php?&nid=82397

Indian people and Indian born people must kick out from Nepal.

Nepali government must use VISA or Access quota systems.