Asked his son to tell the truth and  face the legal battle boldly.

@Trishul

Nayanepalibabu is a dumb maoist.  Nowhere in the history of the word a king is referred as "ex".  Only Nepal's SLC third division journalists use the word "ex". Obviously they didn't study any further after attempting SLC for the third time. Use google to utilize some common sense.

Agree with you nagarikeport. King is always a king no matter what..period.  Tyo 'Bhoo-Poo' or 'Ex' bhanney title tyo choor netaharu ko laagi maatrai ho coz' everybody in the politics wants those so-called 'SEATS'.

Nayanepalibabu is super dumb !

Criticizing me does not make Gyanendra a king. Nor it makes Paras innocent. 

Laugh on my ass NayaNepalBabu. Do you have a proof of him murdering his family? Or were there to witness it?

I found it, there is written the word-ExKing.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/search/?q=Ex-King

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/04/18/afghan.king/index.html

@ NayaNepalibabu

This NayaNepaliBabu is exactly like new nepal, ASTABYASTA........you proved yourself a super duper dumb by blaming Gyanendra in royal massacre....hahaha...............you must be a big fan of bollywood masala movies......you are either a dumb or a hardcore chamcha of a political party !!!!!!

Nalapani....GORKHALI SPIRIT NEVER DIES !!!!

wait till next round of wikileaks. just like last round confirmed india's financial assistance to moaists to abolish monarchy in nepal. next round of wikileaks should provide who and how much india paid for royal massacre. along with india's real true MOTIVE behind waiting so badly to print nepali MRPs (machine readable passports).

but we don't need wikileaks to tell us the real problem here and the real conspirator here india, do we. well maybe other than the so called "intellectual fools" who are so far in tough with reality and ground situation in nepal...it's pretty obvious for average nepalis. i won't say there wasn't indian influence during monarchy but yesto nango naach during broad daylight by india on our soil ta dekhna pardina thiyo ni. don't get me wrong, monarchs also made lot of deals with india where they knew the consequences of giving something meant getting something in return that will benefit the nation in the long run too. the kind of progress panchyaat system made in nepal during it's 30 year tenure, it will take political parties another 300 years if not more. only difference now, maoists and all there bheda netas are making deals with india at the expense of average nepali and what they are getting back from india in return is only for their OWN interests and benefits.

Read "Nepal Royal Massacre & the Mystery Unfolding".  It was published 2 years ago.

if anybody asks if iv seen gyanendra killing birendra's family my answer is obviously no? but did you see neil armstrong landing on the moon? 

We know he is not king but ex king  but in general we will say king and nothing wrong with it. Do not forget that he was a king and I do not want to dig his past but just the concern about the word king only.

No one says ex-president or senator. 

Bhojpure,

 If you google it, many big news papers use the word- expresident.

I could not trust on your claim.

what about former president or former king?

Last week CNN was addressing "President Bush" and "President Clinton".

I am surprised to see change in name of people after loss of their post. Most of the media persons and politicians (netas/ cadres) call Gyanendra Shah. Ridiculous!!!!!! His name is Gyanendra Bir Bikram Shah. I had never seen a person's name reduced after he lost his post/ designation. When Makune is nomore a PM his name should be Madhe Nepal.

It is the only Maoist wanted to wipe out many culture as Mao did in China, and it takes a time to be used to of it and take it easy and do not act like you have allergy too like the Maoists do ( they have taught  that way and first lesson starts from hating certain things).