[VIEWED 4586
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
kaji sahab
Please log in to subscribe to kaji sahab's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 3:39
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
i acknowledge that the king was selfish and took power in his hands. everyone has right to hate or love him but i dont understand why maoist have so much hatred against pritibhi narayan shah?? if he had not unified the country, then we would probably be like tibet. i dont understand why "ekta diwas: is no more celebrated. i cant figure out why his statue is covered infront of singha durbar. why do u feel about this guys?? coz king birendra; whom almost everybody loved and then king gyanendra are from the same shah dynasty of pritibhi narayan shah. nepali haru le neta ko pachadi nalagi afno magaz pani use garnu paryo kaile kahi. k bhannu hunchha saathi haru????
|
|
|
|
sangfroid
Please log in to subscribe to sangfroid's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 5:35
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I won't answer all of your questions...but will answer few.. 1. His statue is covered nowadays because part of it was damaged by protestors long back...Since then, they are covering it. 2. It is true that there won't have been Nepal if he had not united...People shouldn't do such to his image and disrespect him....He deserves respect...BUT though i say he deserves respect, I do not agree on one thing - that he is a Brave king... he won by deception, attacked kantipur valley on days when people had festivals.. if he had really been brave, he would have attacked some other day... he married some queens of bhaktapur or patan( this i forgot) to have good relation with them and then attack kantipur... In our history, he deserves respect and people should not do such to him ...you are right... but i was only telling that he was not really a brave king... brave ones never shoot from behind you !!
|
|
|
CrystalCracker
Please log in to subscribe to CrystalCracker's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 12:40
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Dude... Drave doesnt only mean "physically brave".... prithvi narayan was mentally brave... coming from a small hilly country like Gorkha, he had the guts to fight against the mighty Kathmandu and 22 and 24 states of Nepal... he certainly was intelligent...... And who was it that said " Everytihing is fair in love and war." Was it Napolean?
|
|
|
MadDoGG
Please log in to subscribe to MadDoGG's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 1:51
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
...OK ......ENOUGH IS ENOUGH....ANY ONE WHO DISRECPECT KING PRITHIVI NARAYAN SHAH .....PLEASE DONT CALL YOUR SELF NEPALI OK.......CALL YOUR SELF WHATEVER...LIKE IF YOU ARE A GURUNG CALL YOUR SELF GURUNG OR NEWAR OR THAPA OR ETC ETC...BUT NOT NEPALI.....BECAUSE THE NAME NEPALI YOU SO CALL YOUR SELF WAS GIVEN TO US BY THIS GREAT KING WHO UNITED GORKHA AND CALLED IT NEPAL......hamro pyaro desh NEPAL........AND WE NEPALESE.......BUT WE ALL HAD A DIFFERENT IDENTITY BEFORE THE SHAH DYNASTY UNITED NEPAL... DIDNT WE????? SO GO BACK TO THAT ERA......AND CALL YOURSELF WHATEVER...........IF YOU CANT DEAL WITH NEPAL'S ORIGINATOR AND ITS ORIGINATION ...........AND YOU WANT TO DISRESPECT OUR WHOLE TRADITION , CULTURE , AND RE-WRITE HISTORY...........PLEASE I BEG YOU TO START BY NOT CALLING YOUR SELF NEPALI OK BECAUSE YOU DONT SEEM TO APPRECIATE YOU NATIONALITY........ JAI NEPAL
|
|
|
Oleg Polanski
Please log in to subscribe to Oleg Polanski's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 2:18
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Right on MadDoGG ... true dat!!
|
|
|
watcher
Please log in to subscribe to watcher's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 4:31
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Inception of Word Nepal and history of Nepal started way beyond the era of PNS. . This fact has also been accepted by propaganda propelling engine (Ministry of education) of ex Nepali junta ( shah clan). This thoughts has be been accepted by historians e.g Dhundi ran Shastri, Babu ram acharaya. Thus PNS does not own history of Nepal or he coined the word Nepal, I do not see a rationale behind calling myself something else if I do not respect PNS. He was any other Plunderer who sucked people of Nepal and paved the way for his offspring to suck the blood and load their excretes on people’s head. Most of his offspring were wimps and they chose to marry nymphomaniacs. No wonder history of Nepal is full of gigolos starting from Gagan Sing, Jang bahadur…. But at the end God took care of them. Just see the way Birendra took pre mature exit from earth. In summary there is nothing to be proud of these kings.
|
|
|
bahunkto
Please log in to subscribe to bahunkto's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 4:40
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
totally with mad dogg in this point.. some ppl dont understand reality bro.. u r right.. jai nepal
|
|
|
ImI
Please log in to subscribe to ImI's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 7:26
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Nepalese monkeys only know one thing ..Destroy destory destory.. If there is anything public they will just break it...Uncivilized people(not all but many . specially those bastard chors who destroy public property and brun others property during protest) All these monkeys should be caught during demonstation and not Jailed but put them in public display in zoo. This would be right punishment for these people. Specially those kids who are inthe front line .They need to be sent in detention camps.Make them study and give them so much homework next time , they won't dare. Corrupt police of Nepal needs to be creative.!!!!! What did PN shah statue ..did i just don't get it ..why they had to break it????may be they want Prachanda's statue there.
|
|
|
gundrukbhaat
Please log in to subscribe to gundrukbhaat's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 8:15
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Throughout history, the Winner always gets the praise. Prithvi Narayan Shah was a cunning king and even though there is this bullshit goin on about him being a visionary and trying to "unify" Nepal, I think it is bullshit. He was just trying to conquer as much of Nepal as he could. I think the way he treated the Kirtipures after he defeated them and the way he backstabbed his "Meet" was very evil thing to do. And if there was no Prithvi Narayan Shah there would have been some other guy who would have unified Nepal anyway. I do give him some credit because unknowingly he gave us one country. However, to respect him for this doesn;t sound very plausible. The only think i respect him for are these: 1) Jai katak nagarnu, jhiki katak garnu 2) Nepal char jaat chatti barna ko phulbari ho. I think those 2 things just sum up why I have a tiny bit of respect for him. If you look down in history, there have been much better kings like Ram Shah and a lot of Malla kings (not all but a lot). Prithvi Narayan Shah was driven by avarice and power. He collected tax from the people so that he could just take as much land as possible. And people have indeed undermined the contribution of PNS's buhari Queen Rajyalaxmi and her dewar Bahadur Shah towards the unification of Nepal. They also did a lot to make Nepal bigger.
|
|
|
Ebaje
Please log in to subscribe to Ebaje's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 8:43
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I am with Bahula Kukkur on this, There is only one King I like and He is PN Shaha
|
|
|
doofy
Please log in to subscribe to doofy's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 9:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Nepal will be history. Its only a matter of time. Why dont the 8 parties change the name of the country too. after all there was no Nepal before the shah kings.
|
|
|
doofy
Please log in to subscribe to doofy's postings.
Posted on 01-27-07 9:58
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
The leaders of Nepal are not leaders they are the followers of the mass.
|
|