भन्नेहरुले राजतन्त्रलाई जति गालि गरेपनि अहिलेको परिपेक्ष्यमा एस कुरा साबित हुन्छ कि नेपाल र नेपाली प्रजतान्त्रकोलागी तयार छैनन् |

लैखिक सिद्दान्तको अनुसार प्रजातन्त्र अनि लोकतन्त्र देशको लागि राम्रो हो तर एसको लागि सिक्षा, अनुशाशन जस्ता सामान्य ज्ञानको जग हुनु आवस्यक छ | सिक्षित जनता अनि त्येसको माथि सिक्षित नेताहरुको अभाबमा प्रजातन्त्र लोकतन्त्रले एक भयाबह अन्धकारमय दिशामा देशलाई धकेल्न सक्छ | एसको सबुत प्रमाण अहिलेको देशको लाचार अवस्थाले संकेत गर्छ |

Theory मा राजतन्त्र जति नराम्रो भएतापनि देशको परिस्थिति अनुसार राजतन्त्रको अलावा अहिले कुनै पनि तन्त्रले देशलाई उकास्न सक्दैन |

नेपाल को दर्दनाक अबस्था संगै नेपाल मा राजतन्त्र को खाचो हुदै गएको भान सबै नेपाली लाइ हुदै गएको छ (प्रचंडे र तेस्को नाजयेज छोरो अंग काजि लाइ बाहेक ) . फसेबूक , twitter देखि हरेक समाचार का कमेन्ट हरु मा समेत त्यो देखिन्छ . राजा सवार हुने हरेक कार्येक्रम मा समेत जनता पैले झैँ उर्लिएका हुन्छन , भर्खरै को राजा को चितवन भ्रमण तेस्को उदाहरण हो . भारत ले चाहे जस्तो नेपाल बात मधेस अलग हुन सकेन , न नेपाल लै खर्लप्प खान सक्यो तेसकारण अब बरु राज तन्त्र नफर्किन भन्न सकिन्न

तेही त मित्र , हामी कहिले देखि "पारस आउ देश बचाऊ" भनेर कहिले देखि भनि राखेका छौ , उनि चै थाइलेडं मा नै मस्त/ब्यस्त छन् |

अनि एउटा कुरो क्या, ८-१० जना उद्दण्ड लंगुर हरुलाई देखाएर लोकतन्त्र नै ठिक छैन भन्दिने भन्या \ अनि ६०१ नम्बरलाई पनि दोष नदीम है , येति धेरै मान्छेको लस्कर चाहिएकै थिएन \ तर अब निर्बाचित नै भैसके पछि के गर्ने \ जति जना सभासद भएपनि पार्टी सिस्टममा crucial अबस्थामा नेत्रित्वो को मुख्य भूमिका हुन्छ \ बहुसंख्यक सभासदले त जातको आधारमा राज्य बिभाजन नगरम भनेकै छन् क्यारे , जबरजस्ती गरेर भएन क्यारे \कतिपय अवस्थामा चै संख्या सानै भएपनि सेन्टिमेन्ट येसरी manupulate गर्छन कि बहुमतलाइ पनि गारो पर्छ \ चतुर र रणनीतिक नेत्रित्वो को येस्तै अवस्थामा आवस्यक पर्ने होला \

राजा भएको भए संघियेता पनि चहिन्थेन भन्ने पनि केहि औलामा गन्न सकिने होलान , तर त्यो बेकार हो \ deconcentration (प्रसासनिक प्रत्यायोजन ) र decentralization (विकेन्द्रीकरण) ले काम नगरेर नै governance को devolution (निक्षेपण) गर्नु परेको हो \ नेपालमा संघियता र लोकतन्त्र मज्जाले काम गर्छ तर समय त लाग्छ नि \

ओ परवेज मुसरफ्फ़ ! कहाँ छौ तिमि? नेपाल आउन मिल्दैन? "नेपाली परवेज" त हामीले निकाल्न सकेनौ !

People followed the maoists blindly because they were blinded by hope. There are still people who are pedalling their degrees they learn in college about democracy. But what they miss is that democracy is not possible without an educated population.

अर्थशास्त्र का बिद्यार्थी ले पढ्नु भएको होला : श्रम र क्यापिटल बडाउदैमा उत्पादकता बढ्दैन : ३०० जना भन्दा बढी को संसद हुनु हुदैन थियो : भिड भाड भए पछि मानिस मानिस नभई भेडा जस्तो ब्यबहार गर्न थाल्छन |
बबालले हरुले सुरु देखि नै बबाल काम गर्दै आएका हुन् | कहिँ नभएको जात्रा नेपालको संसंद मा ( का को हाडिगाउ )|

I don't believe that the mass has to be well educated for democracy to flourish. You can always smart people up with good leaders. The problem in Nepal as I see is not the literacy rate of people or rather lack of. It is the short-sightedness and lack of sense of belonging, accountability and of duty towards the country.

Let's say there are 100 sheep on a grazing field and 5 shepherds responsible of bringing 25 sheep each back in the farm every evening. The these 5 shepherds are well organized, disciplined and know very well their responsibility, the task will become very simple. But if these 5 shepherds don't get along at all, don't communicate with each other very well and can't stand each other, bringing the sheep back in the farm from the grazing field will be a struggle. Each one will want to have his herd in first, will do anything to achieve this and will eventually create a mess and chaos on the field.
And that is the situation of nepalese leaders. So the problem is not democracy.

Hurray

Your example assumes that the sheeps are uneducated and they will follow the shepherds blindly so that is why your example fails in the context of educated people for democracy.

The problem is that even after knowing how corrupted and unreliable the leaders are, the people are still following those leaders. If the people were educated then they would not follow these incompetent leaders

Shahi baba, I understand what you are saying and I do share the same feeling about the nepalese people who are following their leaders. But I do not agree that it is due to lack of education. For me this is more due to lack of wanting to sacrifice for someone else. In general and in my opinion, nepalese people have long stopped to think about their country and the future generations. They think first for themselves and the rest is "herdai jaula". This is why most of them identify themselves with a certain political party to reap benefits from it. In today's context, a nepali should think beyond his political alliance. The future of the country is being made at present and this is a very decisive situation.
But you cannot blame all this to the lack of education. Majority of indians were not educated when India gained it's independence, yet democracy flourished just fine. India had good leaders with vision when british left them.
Now take France and french revolution as an example. Most of the french were peasants when they took up arms and beheaded their king and royalists. But the men leading the revolution or the ones that appeared later to build the country and take it to the new direction were educated, had vision, knew what they wanted and what they did not.

I understand and like you wonder why nepalese just keep following their incompetent leaders. But the truth is, most of the educated nepalese have left Nepal and the from the ones that are left, there isn't one willing to sacrifice or devote his life to the country. I had many bhutanese friends in the US and almost all of them went back home once they were done with their studies. They had love for their country that we nepalese don't have towards ours. Just because one loves dal-bhat, loves nepalese folk songs, sports dhaka-topi once in a while does not make him partiotic. There are very few nepalese that have gone back to do something to the society and Nepal. I am not talking about those who go back to pick up a managerial job in a Bank with his MBA degree or the ones who go to handle their dad's business.

My neighbour who is a retired british is going to Nepal in few months with a team of 20 social workers to show and help nepalese villagers build wells. Seriously, is this something we neplaese cannot do by ourselves? Does everything in our country need to be done by foreigners? Are we that hopeless?

Hurray you agree that most of the educated Nepalese have left Nepal so what is left is mostly uneducated. Lack of education is one of the main reason why democracy has been raped and plundered by the politicians.

That is why the maoist movement was started from the villages. They gathered uneducated people with fear and lies and gave them guns to spread more fear and lies. The mass of uneducated people following cunning leaders have almost destroyed our country.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30899711